Metropolitan Life Insurance Subsidy News
On November 14, 2006, the New York City
Industrial Development Agency approved a deal to let Metropolitan Life
escape a $27 million subsidy agreement made with the city in 2001 to
relocate 1,750 jobs in Long Island City, Queens. Under the terms
of the clawback provision (money back guarantee), the city was eligible
to collect $24 million from MetLife for reneging on the deal.
Instead, the city chose to fine the company $5 million and obtain a
promise from MetLife to retain at least 1,750 workers in New York City
until 2026 (rather than 2021 as currently stipulated), and occupy at
least 30% of the Queens office building until 2014.
Read
a statement from Good Jobs New York in response to this recent
corporate subsidy news.
This
came on the heels of reports that Merrill Lynch, another subsidy
recipient, may explore the option of leaving New York City when its
current lease expires at the World Financial Center. In this case, Mayor
Bloomberg took a
hard line stance and stated that he has "always been opposed to
subsidies to keep people in New York" and "would not expect Merrill
Lynch to ask for any subsidy, nor would I expect the city to give them
one."
Both
Merrill Lynch and MetLife failed to meet their job commitments in fiscal
year 2005 associated with the large subsidy packages they received.
As a result, each has had their future benefits reduced.
See a breakdown
of the subsidies received, subsidies used, jobs created, and subsidy
reduction amounts for Merrill Lynch and MetLife.